Archive for the ‘marijuana’ Category

Media Hysterics About Supposed Cancer Link Nothing New

Posted on February 12th, 2009 in NORML, advice, cannabis, drugs, ganja, learn, marijuana, medical cannabis, medical marijuana, pot, studies, weed | 1 Comment »

There has been a lot of recent news about pot causing testicular cancer. Well, it’s BS.

Read the full article here explaining why it’s BS

Police Chief says to legalize Cannabis (video)

Posted on February 12th, 2009 in cannabis, drugs, ganja, government, learn, marijuana, medical cannabis, medical marijuana, pot, smoke, truth, truth about, video, war, weed | 2 Comments »

A police Chief speaks his mind about the drug war, cannabis, alcohol and other “drugs”.

Click here to see the video (opens in new window)

A guy speaking the truth about Pot, well done (video)

Posted on February 11th, 2009 in cannabis, drugs, ganja, government, information, marijuana, medical cannabis, medical marijuana, multimedia, pot, scientific, smoke, studies, truth, truth about, video, weed | No Comments »

Happy Birthday to Bob Marley!

Posted on February 6th, 2009 in cannabis, ganja, jamaica, marijuana, medical cannabis, medical marijuana, weed | 1 Comment »

Let us all celebrate the birth of reggae legend Bob “Nesta” Marley (February 6, 1945 - May 11, 1981) with this archival video of Mr. Marley discussing his favorite herb. Bob also sang the praises of ganja in songs such as “Kaya,” “Three Little Birds,” “Three O’Clock in the Morning (Roadblock),” and many others… Now, excuse me while I light my spliff!

Post about Michael Phelps and his weed incident

Posted on February 4th, 2009 in Michael, Michael Phelps, Phelps, bong, cannabis, ganja, marijuana, pot, smoke, truth, truth about, weed | 4 Comments »

EDIT: Corrected links
I wasn’t going to post about it but now I’m going to…

Apparently Michael Phelps was caught taking a bong hit. Everyone seems to be making a huge ass deal about it. So what, he smoked some weed. Big deal. Cannabis is safe (do some research). What he did was NOT wrong, illegal maybe but not wrong. People need to get over it.

I’m tired of all the bullshit around saying pot is bad and that it kills and all this other crap. Pot is safe, non-toxic, can’t kill you (unless you are allergic to it which is very very very rare), you can’t overdose on it, it has many thousands of modern uses, it won’t corrupt the youth, it won’t make you nuts and it will not make you aggressive.

All the stuff you hear from the DEA and other Anti-Drug organizations is total bullshit. Do yourself a favor and read ALL of the stuff at the following links. Yea it’s a lot of reading but your brain deserves to have some truthful knowledge. If you DON’T read ALL of the following, then you don’t care to know the truth. Ignorance isn’t bliss.

The real reason cannabis is illegal

10 Cannabis studies that the government wish they never funded

The truth about the War on Drugs (video)

Legalize it: Yes we can!

10 Pot Studies Government Wished it Had Never Funded

Posted on February 1st, 2009 in ganja, government, marijuana, pot, proof, scientific, studies, weed | 2 Comments »

10 Pot Studies Government Wished it Had Never Funded
Found here

A massive study of California HMO members funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) found marijuana use caused no significant increase in mortality. Tobacco use was associated with increased risk of death. Sidney, S et al. Marijuana Use and Mortality. American Journal of Public Health. Vol. 87 No. 4, April 1997. p. 585-590. Sept. 2002.

Veterans Affairs scientists looked at whether heavy marijuana use as a young adult caused long-term problems later, studying identical twins in which one twin had been a heavy marijuana user for a year or longer but had stopped at least one month before the study, while the second twin had used marijuana no more than five times ever. Marijuana use had no significant impact on physical or mental health care utilization, health-related quality of life, or current socio-demographic characteristics. Eisen SE et al. Does Marijuana Use Have Residual Adverse Effects on Self-Reported Health Measures, Socio-Demographics or Quality of Life? A Monozygotic Co-Twin Control Study in Men. Addiction. Vol. 97 No. 9. p.1083-1086. Sept. 1997

Marijuana is often called a “gateway drug” by supporters of prohibition, who point to statistical “associations” indicating that persons who use marijuana are more likely to eventually try hard drugs than those who never use marijuana - implying that marijuana use somehow causes hard drug use. But a model developed by RAND Corp. researcher Andrew Morral demonstrates that these associations can be explained “without requiring a gateway effect.” More likely, this federally funded study suggests, some people simply have an underlying propensity to try drugs, and start with what’s most readily available. Morral AR, McCaffrey D and Paddock S. Reassessing the Marijuana Gateway Effect. Addiction. December 2002. p. 1493-1504.

The White House had the National Research Council examine the data being gathered about drug use and the effects of U.S. drug policies. NRC concluded, “the nation possesses little information about the effectiveness of current drug policy, especially of drug law enforcement.” And what data exist show “little apparent relationship between severity of sanctions prescribed for drug use and prevalence or frequency of use.” In other words, there is no proof that prohibition - the cornerstone of U.S. drug policy for a century - reduces drug use. National Research Council. Informing America’s Policy on Illegal Drugs: What We Don’t Know Keeps Hurting Us. National Academy Press, 2001. p. 193.

DOES PROHIBITION CAUSE THE “GATEWAY EFFECT”?): U.S. and Dutch researchers, supported in part by NIDA, compared marijuana users in San Francisco, where non-medical use remains illegal, to Amsterdam, where adults may possess and purchase small amounts of marijuana from regulated businesses. Looking at such parameters as frequency and quantity of use and age at onset of use, they found no differences except one: Lifetime use of hard drugs was significantly lower in Amsterdam, with its “tolerant” marijuana policies. For example, lifetime crack cocaine use was 4.5 times higher in San Francisco than Amsterdam. Reinarman, C, Cohen, PDA, and Kaal, HL. The Limited Relevance of Drug Policy: Cannabis in Amsterdam and San Francisco. American Journal of Public Health. Vol. 94, No. 5. May 2004. p. 836-842.

Federal researchers implanted several types of cancer, including leukemia and lung cancers, in mice, then treated them with cannabinoids (unique, active components found in marijuana). THC and other cannabinoids shrank tumors and increased the mice’s lifespans. Munson, AE et al. Antineoplastic Activity of Cannabinoids. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Sept. 1975. p. 597-602.

In a 1994 study the government tried to suppress, federal researchers gave mice and rats massive doses of THC, looking for cancers or other signs of toxicity. The rodents given THC lived longer and had fewer cancers, “in a dose-dependent manner” (i.e. the more THC they got, the fewer tumors). NTP Technical Report On The Toxicology And Carcinogenesis Studies Of 1-Trans- Delta-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol, CAS No. 1972-08-3, In F344/N Rats And B6C3F Mice, Gavage Studies. See also, “Medical Marijuana: Unpublished Federal Study Found THC-Treated Rats Lived Longer, Had Less Cancer,” AIDS Treatment News no. 263, Jan. 17, 1997.

Researchers at the Kaiser-Permanente HMO, funded by NIDA, followed 65,000 patients for nearly a decade, comparing cancer rates among non-smokers, tobacco smokers, and marijuana smokers. Tobacco smokers had massively higher rates of lung cancer and other cancers. Marijuana smokers who didn’t also use tobacco had no increase in risk of tobacco-related cancers or of cancer risk overall. In fact their rates of lung and most other cancers were slightly lower than non-smokers, though the difference did not reach statistical significance. Sidney, S. et al. Marijuana Use and Cancer Incidence (California, United States). Cancer Causes and Control. Vol. 8. Sept. 1997, p. 722-728.

Donald Tashkin, a UCLA researcher whose work is funded by NIDA, did a case-control study comparing 1,200 patients with lung, head and neck cancers to a matched group with no cancer. Even the heaviest marijuana smokers had no increased risk of cancer, and had somewhat lower cancer risk than non-smokers (tobacco smokers had a 20-fold increased lung cancer risk). Tashkin D. Marijuana Use and Lung Cancer: Results of a Case-Control Study. American Thoracic Society International Conference. May 23, 2006.

In response to passage of California’s medical marijuana law, the White House had the Institute of Medicine (IOM) review the data on marijuana’s medical benefits and risks. The IOM concluded, “Nausea, appetite loss, pain and anxiety are all afflictions of wasting, and all can be mitigated by marijuana.” While noting potential risks of smoking, the report added, “we acknowledge that there is no clear alternative for people suffering from chronic conditions that might be relieved by smoking marijuana, such as pain or AIDS wasting.” The government’s refusal to acknowledge this finding caused co-author John A. Benson to tell the New York Times that the government “loves to ignore our report … they would rather it never happened.” Joy, JE, Watson, SJ, and Benson, JA. Marijuana and Medicine: Assessing the Science Base. National Academy Press. 1999. p. 159. See also, Harris, G. FDA Dismisses Medical Benefit From Marijuana. New York Times. Apr. 21, 2006
Censorship Sucks Balls is Digg proof thanks to caching by WP Super Cache!

eXTReMe Tracker